Monografias.com > Sin categoría
Descargar Imprimir Comentar Ver trabajos relacionados

Noise in Baena. Didactic proposals for improving the quality of city life (página 3)



Partes: 1, 2, 3

 

OBSERVATION LIST

 

Field to observe: Responsible
participation

 

 

PUPIL

S/He participates

S/he doesn't
participates

Other attitudes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

RECORD OF ANECDOTES

 

DATE

DESCRIPTION OF THE
FACT

OBSERVATIONS

 

19/10/05

 

 

 

 

 

19/10/05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

19/10/05

 

 

 

 

19/10/05

 

 

 

21/10/05

-A very reduced group of students finds it a
little difficult to take part in the discussion on the
activity of the Press and noise.

 

 

 

 

– In the activity of the Press and noise,
students highlight the noise from motorbikes and bars. It
may be due to the fact that motorbikes are numerous and
noisy in Baena, mainly because they are not usually
fitted with exhaust pipe. Bars are also very numerous in
the town.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

– Besides traffic noise, students find
noteworthy the financial aspect related with the costs of
correcting acoustic pollution in Spain (as much as the
Environmental Agency annual budget).

 

 

– Students synmpathize with those neighbors
whose houses are next to pubs and discos. They admit that
these establishments are very noisy.

 

 

– All the topics on noise are interesting to the
pupils. They want to learn on any topic. They find
everything related to noise interesting. We find this
very important because it shows motivation and it proves
that students are immersed in the problem.

– The teacher encourages and stimulates them.
Then all take part in the discussion with fluency and
without any problems.

-The teacher points out to them that motorbikes
should be fitted with the corresponding exhaust pipe
because it is so established by antinoise legislation.
The teacher considers as well that there are too many
bars in Baena, but the noise that they cause, although
considerably high, is not too worrying. In this regard,
it may be worse the long time that people spend in
bars.

– The teacher points out to them that it is
indeed a very high budget, that is why civic education on
noise is important.

– The teacher tells them that the noise produced
by pubs and discos is very annoying for the neighborhood
and harmful for the users` health and quality of life. It
is therefore necessary to do something to palliate the
noise generated by these sources.

– The teacher, on the other hand, is fully
motivated and stimulated to keep working
enthusiastically, especially when he sees students highly
motivated.

STUDENT´S AND
TEACHER´S DIARY

 

DATE

OBSERVATIONS

 

19/10/05

 

 

19/10/05

 

 

 

21/10/05

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

21/10/05

– Pupils show neither difficulties nor anything
outstanding with regard to this the activity, which is
means that they have enjoyed it and it has been
interesting to them, according to their behaviour during
its development (teacher's direct
observation).

– All the pupils take part actively and
attentively in the development of the activity , showing
concentration, respect towards partners, being critical
and showing pleasure to learn and to know. They are also
interested in the activity, participating in a
responsible way and appreciating the work of the
group/class, as well as the importance of the written
media.

– Pupils write down some of their preferences in
connection to what they would like to learn and to
investigate regarding noise and its problem:

To learn:

. Consequences of noise for health

. Sources of noise

. How noises are measured

. People's perception regarding noise

. How to help other people on the topic of
noises

To investigate:

. Sources of noise

. People's perception on noise

. Struggle against noise

. Damages caused by noise on health

. Noise measuring

. Noise in the city of Baena

. Legislation and noise

. Responsibility of the authorities regarding
the problem of noise

. Solutions to the problem of noise

– The teacher states that students`s preferred
topics will be dealt with. This involves students even
more in their learning process on noise.

 

 

 

REPORT

CONCEPTS

%

PROCEDURES

%

 

ATTITUDES AND VALUES

%

 

A. S/he progresses satisfactorily

100

100

100

B. S/he knows but some aspects are
confusing

0

0

0

C. S/he has not internalized new
concepts

0

0

0

These "long" activities are dealt with under the focus
of attitudes and values, which are deeply stressed. Many overall
concepts on noise were worked on, as well as important procedures
for Environmental Education, and many attitudes and values were
also raised. Likewise, most of the didactic interventions implied
an action by pupils on the environment.

As an example of an action in the environment we now
present the action carried out by the pupils of 4th of E.S.O in
the didactic activity on the perception and knowledge of the
people from Baena about noise.

Students focused their action in the making of posters,
leaflets and television advertisements on noise, with the purpose
of making citizens aware of the problem generated by this
pollutant.

In the posters and leaflets the following topics: were
approached:

– Effects of noise on people.

– Struggle against noise.

– Sound and noise.

– Noise in society.

– Acoustic pollution.

– Noise in the home.

– How to avoid noise.

Personal
protection.

– Noise agents.

– Preventive measures.

– Noise and Municipal Ordinances.

– Noise in children`s life.

– Alternative to the sources of noise.

– Noise and the street.

– Noise and night.

– Communication and noise.

After making the posters and leaflets, they were
photocopied for their later diffusion throughout the city (shops,
schools, city council, youth house, unions, etc.). Ten copies of
each poster were made. As there were 7 posters, we obtained a
total of 70 posters. There were also 7 leaflets and 30
photocopies of each were made, thus getting as many as 210
leaflets. Once the posters and leaflets were photocopied,
students in groups posted them in different places of Baena for
their diffusion. The posters were placed in different clarly
visible shop windows as
well as in notice boards. The leaflets were spread in shops,
schools, City council, Youth House, old people`s home, unions,
etc.

As for the television advertisement, students had
prepared in groups the performance of their corresponding
advertisements (for them to do so, they had the literal content
of the television advertisements that they had previously
prepared). The classroom was conditioned for such an event.
Before shooting an advertisement, several tests were made. Then,
it was recorded and once all the ads were finished, they were
edited in the local television studios. There, production would
be made: the advertisements would be framed in black and the name
of the authors would appear in the lower part).

Once completely finished all the advertisements in the
studios of "Television Baena", they were diffused. They were each
broadcast a couple of times a day, during one month. Later on,
they would be broadcast rather less often.

In the television advertisements the following topics
were approached:

– Difference between sound and noise.

– Effects of noise on health.

– Noise and pollution.

– Noise and communication.

– Noise and quality of life.

– Struggle against noise.

– Noise and legislation.

– Preventive measures.

– Acoustic Pollution.

– Protection against noise.

– Noise and society.

– Noise at home.

– Sources of noise.

– Noise and leisure.

– Hearing conservation programmes.

The results of these "long" interventions show
this:

Regarding the influence of the didactic activities
carried out in the increase of their awareness of the problem
generated by noise:

1) In a scale between 0 and 10, they rate above 9 the
fact that the interventions have been useful to increase their
awareness of the problem generated by noise.

To illustrate this aspect, we now show Table 8,
corresponding to the didactic activity of amplification of
concepts about noise.

Table 8

REGARDING IF THE INTERVENTION
CARRIED OUT HAS BEEN USEFUL TO INCREASE

THEIR AWARENESS OF THE PROBLEM
GENERATED BY NOISE

Rating from 0 to 10 (0: very low,
10: very high)

 

MEN´S AVERAGE

WOMEN´S AVERAGE

 

Yes the intervention has been
useful to increase

their awareness of the problem
generated by noise: 8.7

Yes, the intervention has been
useful to increase their awareness of the problem
generated by noise: 9.4

 

TOTAL AVERAGE (Men +
Women)

 

Yes, the intervention has been
useful to increase their awareness

Of the problem generated by
noise: 9

 

Note: The numbers represent: the average for
men, women and total (men and women).

As we observe in Table 8, this didactic intervention has
been useful for all the pupils to increase greatly their
awareness of the problem generated by noise, rating this fact
with an average of excellent (9), being the average rating for
men excellent (8.7) and excellent, equally, for women (9.4). As
we can see, the didactic intervention has been useful for women
to increase more their awareness of the problem generated by
noise than for men.

As far as concepts are concerned:

2) In all cases, after the intervention, new categories
appear, as well as new examples inside each category that didn't
appear before the intervention, which is indicative that there
has certainly been learning.

As an example, we now show Table 9, corresponding to the
didactic activity of amplification of concepts about
noise.

Table 9

EFFECTS OF NOISE

 

CATEGORIES

 

BEFORE THE
INTERVENTION

AFTER THE INTERVENTION

 

1. Effects on the body (not in the ear): (68.7,
55, 62.1)

– Headache

– Nervousness

– Stress

– Malaise

– Illnesses

– Insomnia

– Depression

– Anger

– Tiredness

– Burden

– Disorders

– Nuisances

– Discomfort

– Uneasiness

– Grumpiness

– Irritation

2. Effects on hearing: (24.9, 33.3,
29.1)

– Deafness

– Hearing problems.

– Hearing loss

3. Social effects: (5.5, 10.9, 8.2)

– Lack of concentración in the work being
done.

– It alters human communication

– Violent reactions

1. Effects on the body (not in the ear): (82.4,
73.4, 78.2)

– Stress

– It affects concentration and rest

– Nervous system

– It affects vision

– Digestive system

– Headache

– Hypertension

– Skin resistance

– Muscular system

– Grumpiness

– Exhaustion

– Cardiovascular system

– Breathing alterations

– Mental disorders to prone people

– Uneasiness

– Anxiety

– Tiredness

– Endocrine system

– Irritation

– It affects organs and systems

2. Effects on hearing: (17.6, 20,
18.7)

– Deafness

– Hearing loss

3. Effects on health and quality of life: (0,
6.6, 3.1)

– It affects life quality

– It affects health in general

 

Notices: The numbers in brackets represent: the
first one, the percentage corresponding to the frequency
with which that category appears for men, regarding the
total sum of the frequencies of the different categories
that appear for men on this question, the second, the
percentage corresponding to the frequency with which that
category appears for women, regarding the total sum of
frequencies of the different categories that appear for
women on this question and, the third, the percentage
corresponding to the frequency with which that category
appears for the total (men and women), regarding the
total sum of the frequencies of the different categories
that appear for the total (men and women) on this
question.

In Table 9, it can be seen how, before the intervention,
the answers can be classified in three categories that, from a
higher to a smaller percentage, make reference to the effects of
noise on the body, except in the ear, with a higher percentage in
men than in women (headache; nervousness; stress; malaise), to
effects on the ear, with a higher percentage in women than in men
(deafness;hearing problems), as well as, to social effects, with
more percentage in women that in men (lack of copncentration in
the work being done; it alters human communication). After the
intervention, the answers can be classified in three categories
that, from a lower to a higher percentage, make reference to the
effects of noise on the body, except in the ear, with a higher
percentage in men than in women (stress; Nervous System;
Digestive system; skin resistance Endocrine System; breathing
alterations), to effects on the ear, with a higher percentage in
women than in men (deafness; hearing loss), as well as to effects
on health and quality of life, a category only mentioned by women
(it affects the quality of life; it affects health in general).
As we can observe, after the intervention, the same categories
remain the most important: those which make reference to the
effects of noise on the body, excepting the ear, as well as, to
the effects on the ear. Also, after the intervention, a new
category appears which makes reference to the effects of noise on
health and quality of life, which was not taken into account
before the intervention. But it is without any doubt in the
category that refers to the effects on noise on the body (not in
the ear) where the biggest changes appear after the intervention,
with new effects, among the most important being the effects on
the Nervous System, a decrease of vision, effects on the
Digestive system, hypertension, skin resistance , Muscular
System, Cardiovascular System, breathing alterations, mental
disorders in prone people, Endocrine System, as well as effects
on diverse organs and systems.

3) Likewisely, after the intervention, the percentage of
people that do not know regarding the outlined question decreases
significantly, which also implies there has been
learning.

Regarding how they have felt and their feelings during
the activity:

4) 100% state that they have felt very well, content and
comfortable. Their feelings have been quite positive, they have
felt satisfied, pleased with the partners and the teacher, as
well as happy to learn, among others.

As for the learning of the techniques through the
procedures worked in the different activities:

5) Although small difficulties were present, finally all
the pupils learned the techniques corresponding to each
activity.

As example that corroborates this aspect, we show in
Table 10 some of the categorizations made by the pupils in the
didactic activity on the perception and knowledge of the people
from Baena about noise.

Table 10

WHAT DO YOU MEAN BY
NOISE?

WHAT DO YOU THINK ABOUT
NOISE?

 

CATEGORIES

CATEGORIES

 

1. Something annoying, unpleasant:(74.9, 40,
59.1)

– Annoying sound

– Very unpleasant sensation

2. Strong sound: (16.6, 30, 22.6)

– A great deal of shoutingp

– Sound with strong intensity

3. Regarding the source of noise: (0, 30,
13.6)

– Traffic

(Cars, motos)

4. Regarding health: (8.3, 0, 4.5)

– Something that damages the ears

1. Something annoying, unpleasant: (60, 58.7,
59.2)

– Something annoying

– Something unpleasant

– It doesn't always bother

2. Examples: (10, 20.4, 16.4)

– A great deal of shouting (Voices)

– A blow with a hammer.

– A fly

– Air coming at night (Storm,
machines)

– Something that prevents from reading
clearly

3. A different sound: (10, 2.9, 5.4)

– Group of non harmonic sounds

– A sound that is expanded in the
space

– Interferences that come from the external
environment

4. Something that sounds: (5, 5.8,
5.4)

– Something that sounds

– A sound

– Everything the ear perceives.

5. In connection with the sanctions: (10, 0,
3.7)

– More sanctions could be imposed.

6. In connection with health: (5, 2.9,
3.7)

– Bad for health

7. Noise generated by people and things: (0,
5.8, 3.7)

– The emission of daily noises generated by
people and things

8. A pollutant: (0, 2.9, 1.8)

– Acoustic pollution

 

DO YOU BELIEVE THAT NOISE IS A
POLLUTANT?

WHICH ARE THE MOST ANNOYING
NOISES FOR YOU?

 

CATEGORIES

CATEGORIES

 

– No: (40, 53.3, 50)

– Yes: (60, 40, 45)

1. In accordance with the place: (0, 50,
40)

– If you are in very noisy places

2. Regarding health: (0, 50, 40)

– It can affect hearing

– It produces nerves, lack ofconcentration,
fatigue

3. Regarding the sound level: (100, 0,
20)

– Because it is sound

He/she doesn't know: (0, 6.6, 5)

1. Traffic: (83.3, 46.1, 64)

– Cars, motorbikess, tractors

2. Leisure places: (8.3, 7.6, 8)

3. Parties: (0, 15.3, 8)

4. Building sites:(0, 7.6, 4)

5. Metallic sounds: (8.3, 0, 4)

6. Neighbors: (0, 7.6, 4)

7. None: (0, 7.6, 4)

8. All: (0, 7.6, 4)

 

DOES NOISE ANNOY YOU?
WHY?

WHEN DOES NOISE ANNOY YOU
MOST?

 

CATEGORIES

CATEGORIES

– Yes: (84.6, 83.3, 84.2)

– No: (15.3, 16.6, 15.7)

1. It is unpleasant: (42.8, 50, 45.4)

(Drum, out of tune music)

2. Sometimes: (14.2, 25, 18.1)

3. They are accustomed: (14.2, 0, 9)

4. To make an uproar: (14.2, 0, 9)

5. Because of traffic: (14.2, 0, 9)

6. Because it produces insomnia: (0, 25,
9)

1. At night: (50, 83.3, 66.6)

2. When the neighbors bother: (16.6, 0,
8.3)

3. According to the time of the year: (16.6, 0,
8.3)

4. Always: (16.6, 0, 8.3)

5. By day: (0, 16.6, 8.3)

As for the attitudes and values:

6) The immense majority of the pupils considers that the
didactic activities carried out have been useful for them to
increase the attitudes and values at stake game during its
development. This aspect is confirmed by the teacher, who has
kept a detailed control of the
evolution of attitudes and values dealt with through direct
observation and systematic observation by means of daily
annotations and lists of observation like those that have been
previously shown.

As an example of the work carried out about attitudes
and values, we set out a role playing on the problems raised by a
noisy factory located inside the city, included in the didactic
activity of the visit to a noisy factory of the town. As previous
considerations, they are told that this factory emits noises,
with the rising nuisances to the neighborhood, that it generates
a great deal of interior noise, which harms workers, and also
that the manager takes no heed of the problems generated by his
company both for neighbors and for workers. They are also told
the functions of an insurance company and of the
Administration´s business inspector.

For the development of this role playing, five
volunteeers are chosen among the pupils attending. Each one
embodies a person affected by the problem (company manager,
workers' representative, representative of the neighbour´s
association affected, representative of the insurance company,
Administration´s Inspector). They discuss these problems
for half an hour. Finally, they reach some conclusions. The
remaining pupils listen attentively to the discussion. Later on,
the pupils judge the attitudes and the positions of the people
who take part in the role playing. We highlight some of the
attitudes and values raised in this discussion by pupils (see
Table 11).

Table 11

ATTITUDES AND VALUES RAISED IN
THE DISCUSSION THAT PUPILS DO CONCERNING

THE ATTITUDE AND THE POSITIONS OF
THE PEOPLE THAT TAKE PART

IN THE ROLE PLAYING

 

1.-Equanimity.

2.-Understanding.

3.-Recognition of the duties and rights of the
other ones.

4.-Constructive criticism.

5.-Recognition of the importance of Law
enforcement.

6.-Recognition of negative attitudes in
others.

7.-Solidarity with the neighbor.

8.-Appreciation of the conditions of other
people's work.

9.-To distinguish positive and negative
attitudes.

10.-To value the search of the common
good.

11.-To value thedialogue attitude.

12.-To value justice.

13.-Valuation of the importance of health and
quality of life.

14.-Valuation of the defense of other
people´s rights.

15.-Supportive attitude to the defense of other
peoples´ rights.

16.-To value dialogue as a basis for solving
conflicts among people. 17.-To value the importance of
reasoning and argument

in dialogues.

18.-To distinguish how far people exhaust all
their resources

in the dialogue in defense of their
rights.

19.-To value the importance of cooperation among
people

to reach a fair end.

20.-To distinguish between what is reasonable
and what

is not in an argument used in the
dialogue.

21.-Attitude of rejection to
intransigence.

22.-To value the importance of listening to the
other s in a dialogue.

23.-To distinguish between selfish and
altruistic positions.

24.-To value the importance of other
peoples´ persistence in their positions when these
are fair.

25.-To notice when arguments lack in a dialogue
among people. 26.-Attitude of rejection to a shouting
dialogue without arguments.

27.-To value the importance of communication
among people.

28.-To differentiate those factors that hinder
communication among people.

29.-To value the importance of dialogue as
opposed to repression. 30.-To value other people´s
solidarity attitude.

31.-Supportive attitude to other people´s
fair claims.

32.-To value the importance of informing otherr
people as an attitude of help 33.-To value the advice and
the attitude of help of the other ones.

34.-To value the importance of the fact that
everybody is benefitted when the common one is
pursued.

35.-To value in the other s their attitude of
rectifying.

36.-To value the importance of giving a second
opportunity.

37.-To value peaceful forms of solving
problems.

38.-To value a reflective attitude.

As far as diverse aspects worked in the didactic
interventions are concerned (planning and coordination of the
activity, teacher's performance, methodology employed, materials
and resources, work of the students´ group, activities
carried out in their group, assessment of their own work, actions
carried out, etc.):

7) In a scale of ratings from 0 to 10 pupils rate
between 8 and 10 these aspects dealt with in the didactic
activities carried out, which shows that all these aspects have
been highly valued by all the pupils.

To illustrate this aspect, we now present Tables 12 and
13, corresponding to the results of the final assessment
questionnaire on the 5 didactic interventions carried out with
the pupils of 4th of E.S.O at the SA.FA School in Baena, during
the School Year 2005/06.

Table 12

AVERAGE CORRESPONDING TO THE
ANSWERS OF THE FINAL ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE ON THE
DIDACTIC INTERVENTION CARRIED OUT WITH THE PUPILS OF 4TH
OF E.S.O AT THE SAFA SCHOOL IN BAENA, DURING THE SCHOOL
YEAR 1998-99

 

QUESTION

AVERAGE FOR MEN

AVERAGE FOR WOMEN

TOTAL AVERAGE

(Men + Women)

 

Rate from 0 to 10

the work carried out by the
teacher

9.31

 

10.00

9.60

 

Rate from 0 to 10

the teacher's attitude

9.38

9.90

9.60

 

Rate from 0 to 10

the methodology employed by the
teacher

8.88

9.60

9.15

 

Rate from 0 to 10

the process followed

for learning

on noise

8.81

9.30

9.00

 

Rate from 0 to 10

the activities carried out as a
whole

8.63

9.60

9.00

 

Rate from 0 to 10

What you have learned about the
attitudes and values dealt with.

8.56

9.30

8.85

 

Rate from 0 to 10 the
materials

and resources employed

for carrying out the
activities

8.50

9.30

8.77

 

Rate from 0 to 10

the actions carried
out

8.69

8.90

8.77

 

Rate from 0 to 10

What you have learned on the
procedures dealt with

8.50

9.20

8.73

 

Rate from 0 to 10

What you have learned on the
concepts dealt with

8.19

9.40

8.65

 

Rate from 0 to 10 what you have
learned with the activities carried out as a
whole

8.31

9.20

8.65

 

Rate from 0 to 10

The usefulness of this
experience

8.10

9.40

8.60

 

Rate from 0 to 10

the pupils´ group
work

7.94

8.30

8.10

 

Rate from 0 to 10

your own work

7.44

8.70

7.92

 

Note: 0: very little, 10: very high. Average
corresponding to the answers given to questions 1-14 of
the Final Assessment questionnaire (Froma higher to a
smaller average).

Table 13

COMMENT ON THEIR OPINION ABOUT
THE EXPERIENCE ON NOISE CARRIED OUT

(Question no. 15 of the final
assessment questionnaire)

 

CATEGORIES

 

THE EXPERIENCE DONE ON NOISE WAS
FOR THEM

 

1. Interesting and amusing
educational experience: (100, 100, 100)

– Very interesting

– Good and
satisfactory

– It has been very
useful

– Very positive

– I have enjoyed it very
much.

– Very educational

– I have had a very good
time

 

BECAUSE

 

1.Regarding what you have learned with the
experience:

(41, 41.9, 41.4)

– I have learned a lot about noise in a pleasant
way

– We have learned new and important concepts,
procedures and attitudes and values

– It has been useful to learn how to work in
group better.

– It has been useful to take measures on this
social problem

– I have learned how to relate with more
people

2. Regarding the teacher: (17.9, 22.6,
20)

– The teacher's work has been very
good

– The teacher has had a very good
behavior

– I thank the teacher's work for their help to
all

3. Regarding the awareness which the experience
has raised (12.8, 9.7, 11.4)

– We have contributed to awareness-raising on
the problem of noise

– We have become aware on the social problem of
noise

– It has helped us and the others

4. Regarding the experience as a whole: (5.1,
3.2, 4.3)

– I have enjoyed it

– It has been a very positive experience for
all

– I have felt very pleased

5. Regarding the depth in which people has
worked:

(5.1, 3.2, 4.3)

– The work carried out has been very
serious

– We have done a good work

6. Suggestions: (5.1, 3.2, 4.3)

– I think that more experiences like this should
be made because we learn a lot.

7. Regarding what the experience has favoured:
(2.6, 6.4, 4.3)

– I have known other people´s
opinions.

– It has allowed us to carry out diverse
performances

8. Regarding health and quality of life: (2.6,
3.2, 2.9)

– It has been useful to improve our quality of
life

– It is a very important topic for our health
and quality of life

9. Regarding attitudes and values: (2.6, 3.2,
2.9)

– It has taught me to be better

– It has been useful to be more
responsible

10. Regarding the problem generated by noise:
(2.6, 0, 1.4)

– Noise is not given the importance that it
has

11. Regarding the purpose of the experience:
(2.6, 0, 1.4)

– The end was very positive

12. Regarding the work methodology: (0, 3.2,
1.4)

– The methodology employed has been very
good

 

Note: The numbers in brackets represent: the
first one, the percentage corresponding to the frequency
with which that category appears for men, regarding the
total sum of the frequencies of the different categories
that appear for men on this question, the second, the
percentage corresponding to the frequency with which that
category appears for women, regarding the total sum of
the frequencies of the different categories that appear
for women on this question and, the third, the percentage
corresponding to the frequency with which that category
appears for the total (men and women), regarding the
total sum of the frequencies of the different categories
that appear for the total (men and women) on this
question.

CONCLUSIONS

As general conclusions of our research we
will point out the following ones:

1) the "short" didactic activities mobilize concepts and
activate awareness towards the problem of noise, but they are not
too effective in building systems of values, in elaborating
procedures and in promoting attitudes.

2) the "long" interventions, by means of the employment
of the constructivist method, are very effective in mobilizing
procedures, attitudes and values, beyond concepts themselves, as
well as in activating awareness of the problem generated by
noise.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ausubel, D. P. y
otros (1983). Psicología educativa. Un punto de vista
cognoscitivo
. México,
Trillas.

-Driver, R. (1981). Pupil's alternative frameworks in
science. European Journal of Science Education, vol. 3,
pp. 93-101.

-Driver, R. (1986). Psicología
cognoscitiva y esquemas conceptuales de los alumnos.
Enseñanza de las Ciencias, vol. 4, pp.
3-15.

-Driver, R. (1988). Un enfoque constructivista para el
desarrollo del
curriculum en
ciencias.
Enseñanza de las Ciencias, vol. 6, pp.
109-120.

-Driver, R. et al. (1985). Children's Ideas in Science
(Open University Press, Milton Keynes).

-Driver, R. y Erikson, G. (1983). Theories into action:
some theoretical and empirical issues

in the study of student's conceptual frameworks in
science. Studies in Science Education,

vol.10, pp. 37-70.

-Driver, R., Guesne, E. y Tiberghien, A. (1989).
Ideas científicas en la infancia

y la adolescencia. Morata/MEC, Madrid, 310
pp.

-Driver, R. y Olham, V (1986). A constructivist approach
to curriculum development

in science. Studies in Science Education, vol.
13, pp. 105-122.

-Fernándes, A., Manzanares, M. (1996). Pupils
helath idea. En Giordan, A., Girault, Y. (Editors). The new
learning models
. Z editions. Nice 6 pp.

-García, A. (1995). La contaminación sonora en la comunidad
valenciana.
Consell Valencià de Cultura,
Valencia.

-García, A. (2006). La Contaminación Acústica: Fuentes,
Evaluación, Efectos y Control.
Sociedad
Española de Acústica.

-Lara, A. (1999) El ruido, agente
contaminante. Razón y Fe. Tomo 240, pp. 45-59,
Madrid.

-Lara, A., et al. (1995). La contaminación sonora. Evaluación,
efectos y control.
Fundación Bancaja.
Valencia.

-Manzanares, M. (1990). Un modelo
didáctico para la enseñanza de las Ciencias. Primeras
Jornadas Nacionales de Didáctica Universitaria.
Consejo de
Universidades, pp. 223-229.

-Manzanares, M. (1997). Ideas del profesorado y alumnado
de Primaria y Secundaria

en relación con Educación
Ambiental e implicaciones didácticas. Congreso
Nacional
de Educación Ambiental.
20 años después de Tbilisi.
Tomo I:
285-291.

-Novak, J.D. (1982). Teoría y práctica
de la educación
(Alianza, Madrid).

-Novak, J.D. (1991). Ayudar a los alumnos a aprender
cómo aprender. La opinión de un profesor-investigador. Enseñanza de las
Ciencias
. Barcelona, 9 (3), 215-228.

-Novak, J.D. y Gowin, D.B. (1984). Aprendiendo a
aprender.
Edit. Martínez Roca, Barcelona, 220
pp.

-Recuero, M. (2000). Ingeniería
Acústica
. Editorial Paraninfo.

-Sánchez, F. J. (1997). Actividades para
Educación Ambiental (Secundaria)
. Ediciones Octaedro.
Barcelona, 142 pp.

-Sánchez, F. J. (1997). Las ideas previas y los
intereses del alumnado en Educación Ambiental. Aula de
Encuentro
. Núm. 0, pp. 9-14, Úbeda
(Jaén).

– Sánchez, F.J. (1998). Ideas previas del
alumnado sobre diversos temas relacionados con la salud. Aula de
Encuentro
. Núm. 1, pp. 8-12, Úbeda
(Jaén).

-Sánchez, F.J. (1998). El ruido: Una experiencia
didáctica. Aula de Encuentro.
Núm. 2, pp. 18-30, Úbeda (Jaén).

-Sánchez, F.J. (1999). El ruido: Una experiencia
didáctica (y 2). Aula de Encuentro.

Núm. 3, pp. 34-68, Úbeda
(Jaén).

-Sánchez, F.J. (2000). Intervención
didáctica sobre el ruido orientada a los trabajadoresde
una industria de
confección de Baena (Córdoba).Aula de
Encuentro
.

Núm. 4, pp. 20-55, Úbeda
(Jaén).

-Sánchez, F.J. (2000). Una actividad
didáctica acerca del ruido. Educadores. Año
42, Vol. 42, Núm.196, pp. 357-405, Madrid.

-Sánchez, F.J. (2000). La
contaminación sonora en Baena.
Gráficas Baenenses, S. L.

Baena (Córdoba), 43 pp.+Cinco anexos.

-Sánchez, F.J. (2001). El ruido en Baena.
Propuestas didácticas para la mejora de la calidad

de vida ciudadana. Consejería de Medio Ambiente
de la Junta de Andalucía. Sevilla, 382 pp.

-Sánchez, F.J. (2001). El ruido en Baena.
Propuestas didácticas para la mejora de la
calidad

de vida ciudadana. Resumen de Tesis
Doctorales
. Año académico 99-00, pp. 140-141,
Universidad de
Córdoba, Vicerrectorado de Investigación, Córdoba.

-Sánchez, F.J. (2001) El ruido en Baena.
Propuestas didácticas para la mejora de la
calidad

de vida ciudadana. Enseñanza de las
Ciencias
. Núm. 3 (Octubre-Noviembre).

-Sánchez, F.J. (2001) El ruido en el antiguo
recinto de la Feria Real de Baena. Revista Tambor. Amigos
del arte, Baena
(Córdoba). Sociedad Recreativo-Cultural Amigos del Arte de
Baena. Baena (Córdoba).

-Sánchez, F.J. (2001). Ideas previas, percepción
y opinión de los ciudadanos sobre calidad

de vida, ruido y problemática medioambiental.
Carpeta Informativa del CENEAM (Centro Nacional de
Educación Ambiental).
Valsaín
Segovia.

-Sánchez, F.J. (2001). Una aproximación a
la calidad de
vida en Baena. Córdoba en Verde. Año 2,
núm. 4, pp. 10-11, Córdoba.

-Sánchez, F.J. (2001). Una aproximación a
la calidad de vida en Baena (II).

Córdoba en Verde. Año 2,
núm. 5, pp. 8-10, Córdoba.

-Sánchez, F.J. (2001). Ideas previas,
percepción y opinión de los ciudadanos sobre
Calidad

de vida y Problemática Medioambiental. Aula de
Encuentro
. Núm. 5. Úbeda
(Jaén).

-Sequeiros, L. (1997). Educar para la
solidaridad
. Octaedro, Barcelona.

-Sequeiros, L. (1997). Transversalidad y Valores.
CAP 97. Universidad de Córdoba.

 

* Francisco Javier Sánchez
Sánchez-Cañete

(Córdoba) ESPAÑA

Nota biográfica: Nacido en Baena (Córdoba)
España.
Doctor en Ciencias Biológicas. Especialidad en
Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales. He publicado
numerosos artículos sobre el constructivismo
en la enseñanza.

* Manzanares Gavilán, Mercedes.

* * Sequeiros San Román,
Leandro.

* Department of Didactics of Social and Experimental
Sciences of the Faculty

of Education Science. University of
Córdoba.

* * Professor of Palaeontology on sabbatical
leave.

Professor of Nature Philosophy. Faculty of Theology of
Granada.

Partes: 1, 2, 3
 Página anterior Volver al principio del trabajoPágina siguiente 

Nota al lector: es posible que esta página no contenga todos los componentes del trabajo original (pies de página, avanzadas formulas matemáticas, esquemas o tablas complejas, etc.). Recuerde que para ver el trabajo en su versión original completa, puede descargarlo desde el menú superior.

Todos los documentos disponibles en este sitio expresan los puntos de vista de sus respectivos autores y no de Monografias.com. El objetivo de Monografias.com es poner el conocimiento a disposición de toda su comunidad. Queda bajo la responsabilidad de cada lector el eventual uso que se le de a esta información. Asimismo, es obligatoria la cita del autor del contenido y de Monografias.com como fuentes de información.

Categorias
Newsletter