Monografias.com > Enfermedades > Salud
Descargar Imprimir Comentar Ver trabajos relacionados

Water-borne transmission of chloramphenicol-resistant salmonella typhi in Mexico




Enviado por Rafael Fragoso



Partes: 1, 2

    1. Summary
    2. Introduction
    3. Methods
    4. References

    Unit of Epidemiology and Enteric
    Diseases Laboratory, institute of Health and Tropical Diseases,
    Secretaria de Salubridad y Asistencia, and Zacatecas State Public
    Health Service, Mexico

    SUMMARY

    In mid 1972 an outbreak of typhoid due to a
    chloramfenicol resistant strain of Salmonella typhi
    occurred in a small village in central Mexico. 83 cases were
    recorded, with 6 deaths. The highest attack-rates were for the
    age-groups 1-14 and 45 and above. Most patients lived in an area
    of the village with the highest population density and the lowest
    income leve1s, close to an irrigation canal which traverses the
    village. Just before the epidemic the municipal water system had
    not been operational because of a defective pump. Food-specific
    attack-rates implicated the drinking of water from the
    canal as the source of the disease, and restoration of the water
    system just before the start of the investigation promptly halted
    the outbreak.

    INTRODUCTION

    IN early 1972 an epidemic of typhoid fever due to a
    chloramphenicol-resistant strain of Salmonella typhi began
    in central Mexico. At first an area including Mexico City and the
    States of Hidalgo and Mexico was involved, but the epidemic
    quickly spread to the adjacent States of Puebla and Tlaxcala, and
    in sub sequent months thousands of cases were reported.
    Epidemiological studies thus far have failed to reveal the source
    of the epidemic.l-3

    Beginning in May, 1972, outbreaks of typhoid due to the
    chloramphenicol-resistant strain were recorded in communities
    outside of the Valley of Mexico. We describe here one such out
    break which occurred in the community of Ciudad Cuauhtémoc
    in the State of Zacatecas. In this instance, the source of the
    outbreak was related to the ingestion of contaminated water from
    an irrigation canal.

    Ciudad Cuauhtémoc is a rural community of 3973
    inhabitants about 90 km. south of Zacatecas City. The village is
    on a high plain with a temperate and dry climate. Most of the
    inhabitants work on nearby communal farms where the principal
    crops are com and beans. The land is not very fertile, and the
    income of the villagers is low.

    The village has a municipal water system to which almost
    all of the houses are connected. The source of water for this
    network is a deep well 1 km. east of the village. The water is
    neither filtered nor chlorinated. The village also has a sewage
    system to which les s than 15 % of the houses are connected. Most
    of the population use outhouses or latrines or, quite commonly,
    defecate on the open soil.

    The town is divided by a river which runs from west to
    east. This river is dry for most of the year; however, at several
    points the municipal sewage system discharges untreated waste
    directly into the river bed, producing stagnant pools. The
    community is al so bisected by a cement-lined irrigation canal
    which parallels the course of the river, branching once. This
    canal usually contains water, the source of which is a nearby dam
    and reservoir.

    There is a single health centre which has a 4-bed
    infirmary staffed by a doctor and a licensed nurse. There are
    neither other doctors nor hospital facilities. Patients requiring
    hospital admission must travel north to Zacatecas or south to
    Aguasealientes.

    As elsewhere in Mexico, enteric disease is hyper endemic
    in Ciudad Cuauhtémoc. Although typhoid fever has been
    recorded, it is not common. During 1971 no cases were reported
    from the community and only 41 cases from the entire 5tate of
    Zacatecas (population 951,000). During the first 5 months of
    1972, only 2 cases were reported in Ciudad
    Cuauhtémoc.

    METHODS

    All households in the community were contacted in a
    house-to-house survey. People with histories of recent illness
    were examined and questioned to determine if they had had typhoid
    fever. Criteria for the diagnosis of typhoid included sustained
    fever, gastrointestinal symptoms, prostration,
    hepatoesplenomegaly, and where possible isolation of S.
    typhi or significant rises in anti-O and anti-H
    titers.

    A series of questionnaires were administered to people
    with typhoid and to healthy individuals selected at random from
    surrounding households. Samples of food and water were collected
    for bacteriological analysis and were 83 cases of typhoid fever
    were identified in the Ciudad Cuauhtémoc outbreak. From
    them a total of 19 strains of S. typhi were isolated, 13
    from heces and 6 from blood. 17 of the 19 strains were resistant
    to chloramphenicol and 2 were sensitive, as shown by the disc
    sensitivity test. 3 of the
    resistant strains and the 2 sensitive ones were phage typed. One
    of the sensitive strains was identified as phage type E1 and the
    other was a W form. The three resistant strains were c1assified
    as Vi degraded approaching phage type A, the characteristic
    strain found in most of the outbreaks in Mexico during
    1972.5-7

    In addition, 56%, of the cases had Widal anti-O title of
    1/160 or greater by the plate method. In the remaining cases in
    which there was neither bacteriological nor serological
    confirmation, the diagnosis was based on c1inical grounds
    only.

    Most patients (68 %) were between the ages of 1 and 14
    years, but al! age-groups were affected (table r). Similarly,
    attack-rates were greater for the 1-4 and 5-15 age-groups,
    although rates were also raised for the groups 45 years of age
    and above. The attack rate was 1'74 per 100 and the ratio of
    affected males to females was 1/1'4 (table r).

    The attack-rate was appreciably greater for females than
    for males (2.3 per 100 inhabitants v. 1·5 per 100
    inhabitants). The difference was largely produced by disparities
    in the attack-rates for the two sexes in the 5-14 and 45 +
    age-groups, especially that of the 5-14 group in which the rates
    were 4.2 per 100

    Partes: 1, 2

    Página siguiente 

    Nota al lector: es posible que esta página no contenga todos los componentes del trabajo original (pies de página, avanzadas formulas matemáticas, esquemas o tablas complejas, etc.). Recuerde que para ver el trabajo en su versión original completa, puede descargarlo desde el menú superior.

    Todos los documentos disponibles en este sitio expresan los puntos de vista de sus respectivos autores y no de Monografias.com. El objetivo de Monografias.com es poner el conocimiento a disposición de toda su comunidad. Queda bajo la responsabilidad de cada lector el eventual uso que se le de a esta información. Asimismo, es obligatoria la cita del autor del contenido y de Monografias.com como fuentes de información.

    Categorias
    Newsletter