Monografias.com > Sin categoría
Descargar Imprimir Comentar Ver trabajos relacionados

Los caminos de la paleoantropologia (página 5)



Partes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5

[108] “humans are the only animals that suffer from hip fractures in bones weakened by osteoporosis, which stem from our unusual compulsion to move about on two legs […] If bipedalism doesn´t offer immediate physical advantage, maybe the answer to its evolution and persistence is some social social advantage”

[109] “…bipedalism could well have been an important catalyst in a novel hominid breeding and survival strategy that incorporated parenting skills, tool use, and other behavior that encouraged brain grown […] Because a big brain needs elaborated programming, at some point hominids must have delayed the maturation of their young after birth just like modern humans do”

[110] “humans are strange for several reasons. We have a huge brain, part of our evolutionary heritage of the past 2 million years or so, and this brain is an important sex organ that governs most of learned sexual behavior”

[111] “…the archaeological evidence suggests that habitual hunting did not begin until late in human evolution, perhaps not until after the appearance of modern humans ”

[112] “fire is a profoundly social experience and was probably an important part of later hominid life at Swartkrans […] There is a close association between fire and the increased need for protection when the caves were used as a living area”

[113] “if language really was a late occurrence in human evolution, then it represents only one by-product of a big brain and could not by itself have been the driving force behind expanding brain size. The dramatic spurt in brain grown that would later distinguish Homo sapiens from Homo erectus ”

[114] “In fact, much of what makes us human in the end –language, culture, social organization- may stem from this unnaturally long period of helplessness in the early part of our lives”

[115] “Culture and symbolic language are central in distinguishing modern humans. We comunícate symbolically through language and has become dependent on culture for survival”

[116] “the modern human is undoubtedly a very special type of animal. Speech, unparalleled behavioural flexibility, a peculiar upright stance, a brain far too big for comfort, and a complex technology all cry out as the markers of human uniqueness”

[117] “culture is a concept central to anthropology, epitomizing much of what we think of as distinctly, or uniquely human […] The capacity for culture may be species specific and genetically endowed”

[118] “what makes us humans is culture”

[119] “Man the culture-bearing animal can replace and embrace all aspects of humanity, from technology to politics to aesthetics”

[120] “… their upright posture, their intense sociality, their intelligence and their capacity for complex behaviour. These are things that make us human”

[121] The Darwinian Timetable for Human History The hominid heritage (25 million years). The great ape heritage (15 million years). The African ape heritage (19 million years). The “Last common Ancestors” heritage (7 million years). The australopithecus heritage (5 million years). The Homo heritage (2.5 million years). The Homo erectus grade heritage (1.8 million years). The 1000-gram brain heritage (300 000 years). The anatomical modern human (Homo sapiens) heritage (140 000 years)

[122] The principal conclusion to be drawn from the evidence and arguments presented here is that the evolution of species bearing the attributes we think of as “human” is not inevitable in the sense of being the preordained outcome of a teleological evolutionary process, but that it is the expected product of the “right” ecological and evolutionary conditions. Hominids and humans have evolved because, given the basic processes and mechanisms of biology and evolution, their adaptative characteristics “solve” the problems posed by certain phylogenetic and ecological circumstances. The purpose of this book has been to try and shown the fit between the pattern of hominid evolution and those circumstances in the context of the principles of evolutionary ecology.

[123] “Neither the special characteristics of humans, nor the limiting nature of the fossil record, must be allowed to limit the question we seek to ask about the evolution of our own species […] We should recognize that we are a unique, but also that we are just another unique species”

[124] The term hominid (which is derived from the family name, the Hominidea) should be used to denote all populations and species with which we share an evolutionary history exclusive of any other living primate. In this text early hominid” refers to hominids before the evolution of Homo sapiens. The term human should be reserved solely for members of the only living subspecies of hominid, Homo sapiens sapiens, or for characteristics found among living populations […] the term “man” used in a biological sense, refers to all members of the subspecies H. s. sapiens and not just to the male sex, it should also be avoid on the same grounds.

[125] “human origins and ultimately human nature are not philosophical questions, but technical ones”

[126] “humans are descended from apes, but have made themselves angels”

[127] “not surprisingly many of these have been selected as the feature that made humans the way they are. Man the tool-maker, man the hunter, woman the gather, Homo economicus, Homo hierarchicus, Homo politicus, and Homo loquans”

[128] “the whole point of this book is to show that being a human and being a hominid are by no means the same thing ”

[129] “the triangle of relationships between sociality [a], intelligence[b] and ecology[c]. c energetic cost and benefits of group living a selection for greater cognitive abilities b ability to exploit complex food types c costs of brain growth b ability to maintain social relationships a social solutions to ecological problems c”

[130] But for better o for worse, it is as legitimate to use the adjective ‘human’ in the inclusive sense of being related to us by descent as in the exclusive one of applying to creatures with the qualities that distinguish us from the rest of the living world. Most anthropologists today would lean toward the inclusive use of the term, to embrace the australopithecines as well as later fossil members of the human group: but it is important to remember that (depending on the characteristics that you regard as being typically human) it might be difficult to view some of these members of the human family as Human in a functional sense

[131] I suppose they must be considered ex officio humans, as members of the genus Homo. But that´s not to say that we would intuitively recognize them as such if we wee to encounter a group of them while out for a stroll on the savanna. In the absence of an agreed functional definition to tell us what is human and what is not, everyone has to make up on her own mind; what is certain, however, is that even the latest Acheuleans were far from fully human as we are today

[132] for by this time the notion of humans as essentially cultural beings had gained broad ascendancy

[133] The power of a persuasive paradigm should never be underestimated, and during the 1960s the concepts of the New Evolutionary Synthesis combined with notions of culture as the basic human attribute to produce a new perspective –even dogma- on the human evolutionary process as a whole […] from anthropology that took the concept that humanity was defined by the possession of culture rather that by any particular physical attribute

[134] “brain size (an attribute which appeals powerfully both it is so easy to quantify and because it somehow expresses the essence of humanness) ”

[135] “language, a uniquely efficient form of communication, has often been looked at as key to brain increase and the improvement of human intelligence communication evolutionary time”

[136] “there´s no doubt in my mind that with the invention of sophisticated bifacially flaked tools such as handaxes we are witnessing yet another major cognitive leap on the part of mankind”

[137] Una vez más debo hacer una advertencia. Los conceptos de los demás autores, que se han citado, incluyen tanto a la mujer como al hombre. Sólo se utiliza el sustantivo hombre por las convenciones del idioma y porque este trabajo tiene como un fin aclarar los términos y dado que el adjetivo humano no puede sustituir al sustantivo hombre, pero éste si incluir a ambos géneros, se opto por el último.

[138] “It is our brains (or our minds) that make us truly human”

[139] “Humans have lateralized brains that are the end product of millions of years of evolution […] That is, enhanced visuospatial skills have increased breeding opportunities in males, whereas processing social vocalizations may have increased the survivorship of famales´ offspring”

[140] “Thus social intelligence per se probably was not the prime mover of human brain evolution. Unlike the brains of other primates, human brains do language”

[141] “Human reproductive phenomena always take place within a cultural context in which their meaning are cultural constructed. Given our unique propensity for employing the body´s rich potential as a symbolic medium”

[142] “Among the unique attributes of modern humans are symbolic culture manifested in language, ritual and art, and a sexual division of labor, with distribution and exchange underwritten by ritual taboos and myth”

[143] No todos son paleoantropólogos, sin embargo sus textos si trabajan el tema de la evolución humana. La diversidad de títulos no muestra que ahora se escriba más, sino que es más sencillo encontrar los textos con una búsqueda en una tienda virtual.

 

Referencias

ABBAGNANO, Nicola. 1998 Diccionario de filosofía. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica. ARDREY, Robert. 1976 The Hunting Hipótesis – A Personal Conclusión Concerning the Evolutionary Nature of Man. New York, Atheneum. traducción de Nestor Mígez: La evolución del hombre: la hipótesis del cazador. Madrid, Alianza editorial, 1978. ARSUAGA, Juan Luis. 1999 El collar del neandertal. En busca de los primeros pensadores. Madrid, Ediciones Temas de Hoy. ARSUAGA, Juan Luis 2001 El enigma de la esfinge. Madrid, Ediciones Temas de Hoy. ARSUAGA, Juan Luis e Ignacio Martínez. 1998 La especie elegida. La larga marcha de la evolución humana. Madrid, Ediciones Temas de Hoy. AYALA, Francisco J. 1985 Origen y evolución del hombre. Madrid, Alianza editorial. BENEDIT, Ruth. 1934 Patterns of Culture. USA, Houghton Mifflin Company Boston. BILSBOROUGH, Alan 1992 Human Evolution. London, Blackie Academic & Profesional. BOERLEGUI, Carlos. 1999 Antropología filosófica, Bilbao, Universidad de Deusto. BOHANNAN, Paul y Mark Glazer. 1993, Antropología. Lecturas. 2a edición, España, Mac Graw Hill BROOM, R. 1933 The Comming of Man. Was it Accident or Design? London H.F.& G. Witherby. BUENO, Miguel 1963 Introducción a la antropología formal. México. Fondo de Cultura Económica. BUNGE, Mario. 1995 Sistemas sociales y filosofía. Buenos Aires, Ed. Sudamericana. Buenos. 1999a Buscar la filosofía en las ciencias sociales. México. Siglo XXI editores. 1999b Las ciencias sociales en discusión. Una perspectiva filosófica. Buenos Aires, Editorial Sudamericana. 2000 La investigación científica. México, Siglo XXI editores. 2002 Ser, saber, hacer. México, Paidos. BUNGE, Mario y Rubén Ardila. 2002 Filosofía de la Psicología. México, Editorial siglo XXI. CAHOUNE (editor) 1996 From Modernism to postmodernism. An antology. Massachusetts, Blackwell Publisher Ltd. CAMPBELL, Bernard G. 1965 The Nomenclature of the Hominidea. Including a Definitive List of Named Hominid Taxa. London, Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland. CAMPBELL, Bernard G. 1988 Humankind Emerging. Fifth Edition, Boston, Scott, Foresman and Company. CANN, Rebeca L, Mark Storekina y Allan C. Willson. 1987 ?Mithochondrial DNA and Human Evolution. New York, Nature, 1 January, 125: 31-36. CASSIRER, Ernst 1997 Antropología filosófica, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica. CELA CONDE, Camilo José y Francisco J. Ayala 2001 Senderos de la evolución humana. España, Alianza editorial. CHOMSKY, Noam 1975 Reflexiones sobre el lenguaje. Buenos Aires, Editorial Sudamericana. COHEN, Claudine 1999 ?Las razas humanas en la historia de las ciencias, En: Jean-Jacques y Anne-Marie Tillier Homo sapiens en busca de sus orígenes. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica. COMAS, Juan. 1968 Definición del género humano. México, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia. 1977 Unidad y variedad de la especie humana. México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. COPLESTON, Frederick. 1981 Historia de la filosofía Vol. 3 De Ockham a Suarez. Barcelona, Grupo Editorial Planeta. 1982 Historia de la filosofía Vol.7 De Fichte a Nietzsche. Barcelona, Grupo Editorial Planeta. 1983 Historia de la filosofía Vol. 5 De Wolf a Kant. Barcelona, Grupo Editorial Planeta. 1988 Historia de la filosofía Vol. 8 De Bentham a Russell. Barcelona, Grupo Editorial Planeta. 1991 Historia de la filosofía Vol. 9 De Maine de Biran a Sartre. Barcelona, Grupo Editorial Planeta. CORETH, Emrich. 1991¿Qué es el hombre? Esquema de una antropología filosófica. Barcelona, Herder. CRISCI, Jorge. 1994 ?La especie: realidad y conceptos. En: Jorge Llorente Bousquest e Isolda Luna Vega (comp.) Taxonomía biológica, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica. DART, Raymond 1957 The Osteodontokerati culture of Australopithecus prometeus. Pretora. Transval Museum. DART, Raymond A. y Dennie Craig. 1959 Adventures with the Missing Link. Nueva York, Harper & Brothers. traducción de Florentino M. Torner, Aventuras con el eslabón perdido. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, 1962. DARWIN, Charles. 1988 The Descent of Man ; and Selection in Relation to Sex. New York, Prometheus Books[1871]. 1997 El origen de las especies. México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México,[1859]. DAVIDSON, Iain y William Noble 1993 ?Tools and Language in Human Evolution? En: Katleen R. Gibson y Tim Ingold (Eds) Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. DELATTRE, A y R. Fernart 1968 ?Tentativa de definición del género Homo. El cráneo humano? en: Olivier, Geoges et al. Definición del género humano. México, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, traducción y prólogo de Juan Comas. DOBZHANSKY, Teodosius. 1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York. 1941 Second edition.

DUBOIS, Eugene. 1896 ?On Phitecanthropus erectus: a Transitional form between Man and Apes?. The Journal of Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, London, The Institute of Great Britain and Ireland, 25 p. 240-255. 1925 ?On the Principal Characters of the Cranium and the Brain the Mandibule and Teeth of Pithecanthropus erectus?. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, Washington, New York, Johdson Reprint Corporation, 7 p.101-109. 1937 ?On the fossil Human skull recently discovered in Java an Pithecanthropus erectus. Man, London, The Royal Anthropological Institute, 37 (1-1237) p. 1-7. ECO, Umberto 1978 Tratado de semiótica general. México, Nueva Imagen. EDEY, Maitland 1975 El eslabón perdido. USA, Time Life International. EISELEY, Loren. 1962 The Immense Journey. New York, Time Reading Program [ 1a edición 1946]. ELDREDGE, Niles. 1985. Unfinished Synthesis. Biological Hierchies and Modern Evolutionary Thought. Oxford University Press, Oxford. Traducción al español: 1997. Síntesis inacabada. Jerarquías biológicas y pensamiento evolutivo moderno. Fondo de Cultura Económica, México.

EVANS- PRITCHARD, E.E. 1990 Ensayos de antropología social. México, Siglo XXI editores. FOLEY, Robert. 1987 Another Unique Species. Patterns in human evolutionary ecology. New York, Longman Scientific & Technical. 1997 Humans before Humanity.Massachusetts, Backwell Publishers, first published in paperback. FODOR, Jerry A. 1999 Conceptos. Donde la ciencia cognitiva se equivocó. Barcelona, Gedisa. FOUCAULT, Michel. 1968 Las palabras y las cosas. México, Siglo XXI editores. FREUD, Sigmund. 2000 [1930] El malestar en la cultura. Madrid, Colofón S.A. FROMM, Erich y Ramón Xirau. 1968 The Nature of Man. Readings selected, edited, and fursnished with an introductory essay by From and Xirau. New York, The Macmillan Company. GALDIKAS, BMF, JB Duffy, H. Odwak, CM Poris 1993 ?Postcranial and the specific recognition system. Human Evolution 8 (49: 281-289. GARCÍA, Rolando. 2000 El conocimiento en construcción. De las teorías de Jean Piaget a la teoría de sistemas complejos. Barcelona, Editorial Gedisa. GEERTZ, C. 1992 La interpretación de las culturas. Barcelona, Gedisa. GEHLEN, Arnold. 1993 Antropología filosófica. Del encuentro y descubrimiento del hombre por sí mismo. Barcelona, Paidos. GHISELIN, Michael T. 1975 ?A Radical Solution to the Species Problem. Sist. Zool 23: 536-544. GIL-WHITE, Francisco J. 2001 ?Are Ethnic Groups Biological ?Species to the Human Brain. The Wenner-Green Foundation for Anthropological Research, Current Anthropology August-October, 42 (4):515-554. GIMÉNEZ, Gilberto. 1996 ?La identidad o el retorno del sujeto en sociología. En: III Coloquio Paul Kirchoff, Identidad, México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México: 11-24. GOLD MORGAN, Michelle. 2002 Análisis de las principales concepciones ontológicas de especie. México, manuscrito y comunicación personal. GOULD, Stephen Jay 1995 Dientes de gallina y dedos de caballo. Barcelona, Crítica. GOODMAN, Morris. 2001 ?A objetive time-base phylogenetic classification of primates that place chimpanzes and humans in the genus Homo?. México, Ludus Vitalis, 11(15): 47-62. HAECKEL, Ernesto. 1898 Estado actual de nuestros conocimientos sobre el origen del hombre. México, Maucci Hermanos Editores, sin fecha [1898]. Primera versión española por Enrique Díaz-Retg. HARRIS, Marvin. 1982 El materialismo cultural. Madrid, Alianza Editorial. 2000 Teorías sobre la cultura en la era posmoderna. Barcelona, Crítica HEINTZ, Nicole 1968 ?Tentativa de definición del género Homo de acuerdo con las características biométricas del cráneo. en: Olivier, Geoges et al. Definición del género humano. México, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, traducción y prólogo de Juan Comas. HIRSCHBERGER, Johannes. 1994 Historia de la filosofía.Tomo II, Barcelona, Herder [1954]. HOROWITZ, Irving L. 1974 ?Crimen, costumbre y cultura: observaciones sobre la teoría funcionalista de Bronislaw Malinowsky. En: Bronislaw Malinowsky. Sexo y represión en la sociedad salvaje. Argentina, Nueva Visión. HOSPERS, John 1984 Introducción al análisis filosófico. Madrid, Alianza Universidad. HOWELLS, William. 1955 Mankind So Far. New York, Doubleday and Company. 1959 Mankind in the Making. The Story of Human Evolution. New York, Doubleday and Company. HUXLEY, Thomas H. 1911 Man´s Place in Nature and other Anthropological Essays. London, Manmillan and Co., (1863). INGOLD, Tim 1991 Evolución y vida social. México, Editorial Grijalbo. ISAAC, Glyn 1989 The Archaeology of Human Origins. Cambidge, Cambridge University Press. J AIN, RavindraK. 1989?The Concept of Man in Anthropology: Beyond Cultural Relativism?. The Eastern Anthropologist, India, Ethnograpic and Folk Culture Society, April-Jun, 42 (2) p. 137-150. JOHANSON, Donald y Blake Edgar. 1996 From Lucy to Language. New York, Simon & Schuster Editions. JOHANSON, Donald, Lenora Johanson y Blake Edgar. 1994 Ancestros. In Search of Human Origins. New York, Villard Books. JOHANSON, Donald y Maitland Edey. 1982 El primer antepasado del hombre. Barcelona, Planeta. KEITH, Sir Arthur. 1931 New Discoveries Relating to the Antiquity of Man. London, Williams and Nogarte. 1949 A new Theory of Human Evolution. London, Watt and Co. Limited, Second impression. KITCHER, Philip 2001 El avance de la ciencia. México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. KLEIN, Richard G. 1999 The Human Career. Human Biological and Cultural Origins. Second Edition, Chicago and London, The University of Chicago Press.

LANCEROS, Patxi. 1996 Avatares del hombre. El pensamiento de Michel Foucault. Bilbao, Universidad de Deusto. LE CRON FOSTER, Mary 1978 ?The Symbolic Structure of Promordial Language. En: S.L. Washburn y Elizabeth Mc Cown (Eds) Human Evolution. Biosocial Perspectives. London, The Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company. LE GROS CLARK W. E. 1934 Early Forerunners of Man. A Morphological Study of the Evolutionary Origin of the Primates. London, Bailliere, Tindall and Cox. 1963 History of the Primates. An Introduction to the Study of Fossil Man. London, University Chicago Press. 1964 The Fósil Evidence. An Introduction to Human Evolution. 2nd edition London, University Chicago Press. Traducción de Lauro Zavala: El testimonio fósil de la evolución humana. Introducción al estudio de la paleoantropología. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica, Segunda edición corregida y aumentada [ primera edición 1955]. LEAKEY, L.S.B. 1953 Adam´s Ancestors. The evolution of man and his culture. New York, Harper Torchbooks, forth edition, [first edition 1934]. 1961 The Progress and Evolution on Man in Africa. London, Oxford University Press. LEAKEY, LSB y Vanne Morris Goodall 1973 Hacia el desvelamiento del origen del hombre. Madrid, Agilar. LEAKEY, LSB, PV Tobias y JR Napier 1964 ?A new Species of the Genus Homo from Olduvai Gorge. Nature, England, Macmillan Magazine Ltd, 202 p.5-7. LEAKEY, Richard. 1981 La formación de la humanidad. [traducción de Monserrat Domingo de miró, asesoría de Dr. José Gilberto Clas] España, RBA Editores. LEAKEY, Richard y Roger Lewin. 1992 Origins Reconsidered. In Search of What Makes us Human. New York, Doubleday. LEROI-GOURHAN, André. 1971 El gesto y la palabra. Venezuela, Ediciones de la Biblioteca Universidad Central de Venezuela. LÉVI-STRAUS, Claude. 1986 Mirando a lo lejos. Argentina, Editorial Emecé. LEWIN, Roger. 1990 La interpretación de los fósiles. Una polémica búsqueda del origen del hombre. México, Planeta. LIEBERMAN 1991 Uniquely Human. The Evolution of Speech, Tought, and Selfless Behavior. England, Harvard University Press. LORITE Mena, José. 1982 El animal paradójico. Fundamentos de antropología filosófica. Madrid, Alianza editorial. LUNA Vega, Isolda. 1994 ?Los conceptos de especie evolutiva y filogenética? en: Jorge Llorente Bousquest e Isolda Luna Vega (comp.) Taxonomía biológica, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica. LYELL, Charles. 1863 The Geological Evidences of the Antiquity of Man. Second edition, revised, London, John Murray. LLANO, Alejandro. 1991 Gnoseología. España, Ediciones Universidad de Navarra, S.A. Pamplona, 3ª edición. MADRID VERA, Juan. 1999 ?La especie: de Ray a Darwin. en: Juan Núñez-Farfán y Luis E. Eguiarte, La evolución biológica, México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. MAGEE, Bryan. 1986 Los hombres detrás de las ideas. Algunos creadores de la filosofía contemporánea. México. Fondo de Cultura Económica. MARÍN, Higinio. 1997 La invención de lo humano .La construcción sociohistórica del individuo. Madrid, Iberoamericana. MAYR, Ernst. 1940 ?Speciation Phenomena in birds. The American Naturalist, New York Press, The science Press, May-Jun, 74 , (752) p. 249-278. MAYR, Ernst. 1942. Systematics and the Origin of Species. Columbia University Press, New York.

MAYR, Ernst (ed.) 1957 The Species Problem. Washington D.C., American association for the Advancement of Science. 1987 ?The Ontological Status of Species: Scientific Progress and Philosophical Terminology? Biology and Philosophy 2: 145-166. MOREY, Miguel 1987 El hombre como argumento. Antropos, Barcelona. MORIN, Edgar. 1974 El paradigma perdido, el paraíso olvidado. Ensayo de bioantropología. Barcelona, Editorial Kairos. 2001a El método. La naturaleza de la naturaleza. Barcelona, Cátedra[1977]. 2001b Los siete saberes necesarios para la educación del futuro. México, Librería El Correo de la UNESCO. 2003 El método. La humanidad de la humanidad. La identidad humana. Barcelona, Cátedra OAKLEY, Kenneth. 1958 Man the Tool-maker. London, Britsh Museum. ORTEGA Y GASET 1995 ?El quehacer del hombre. En: Pilar Barroso Acosta, Ricardo Martinez Lacy, Ma. Cristina Montoya Rivero, Rosalía Velásquez Estrada (Compiladores) El pensamiento histórico ayer y hoy. Tomo III. México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. PFEIFFER, John E. 1969 The Emergence of Man. New York, Harper & Row Publishers. PIERCE, John R. 1972 ?Communication. New York, Scientific American, September, 227 (3): 3-13. PILBEAM, David. 1970 The Evolution of Man. London, Thames and Hudson. 1979 ?Toward a Concept of Man?. Natural History, New York, American Museum of Natural History, 88 (2) p. 100-109. PYCRAFT, W.P. 1925 ?Diagnosis of four species and Sub-species of the Genus Homo. Man XXv, Nos 1-121, Octubre : 162-164. RABADE Romeo, Sergio, Antonio M. López Medina, Encarnación Pesquero Franco. 1988 Kant: conocimiento y racionalidad. El uso teórico de la razón. Madrid, Editorial Cincel. READER, John. 1982 Eslabones perdidos. En busca del hombre primigenio. USA, Fondo Educativo Interamericano. RENSCH, Bernhard. 1972 Homo sapiens from Man to Demigod. New York, University Press. Translated by C.A.M. Sym. REYNOLS, Peter 1993 ?The Complementation Theory on Language and Tool Use? En: Katleen R. Gibson y Tim Ingold (Eds) Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. RIBEIRO, Darcy. 1971 El proceso civilizatorio: de la revolución agrícola a la termonuclear. Buenos Aires, Biblioteca fundamental de hombre moderno. RIDLEY, Mark. 1996 Evolution. 2nd edition. USA, Blackwell Science Inc. RIGHTMIRE, Philip G. 1990 The Evolution of Homo erectus. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. ROMER, Alfred Sherwood y Thomas S. Pearson. 1981 Anatomía comparada. 5a edición. México, Interamericana. RORTY, Richard 2000 Verdad y progreso. Escritos filosóficos. Barcelona, Piados. SARTRE, Jean-Paul. 1957 El existencialismo es un humanismo. Buenos Aires. SARUKHÁN, José 1998 Las musas de Darwin. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica. SCHELER, Max. 1997 El puesto del hombre en el cosmos. Buenos Aires, Editorial Losada, [1938] 21ª edición. SCHUARTZ, Jeffrey H. 2001 ?A review of the systematics and taxonomy of Homonoidea. México, Ludus Vitalis, 11 (15) : 15-46. SCHULTZ, A.H. 1950 ?The physical distintions of man?. Yearbook of Physical Anbthropology, 6: 89-110. SEBEOK, Thomas A. 1996 Signos: una introducción a la semiótica. España, Paidos Editorial. SILVA Camarena, Juan Manuel. 1990 ?La pregunta por el ser del hombre y la cuestión del ser: dos interrogaciones sin respuesta posible. En: Juliana Gonzáles y Lizbeth Sagols (eds). El ser y la expresión. Homenaje a Eduardo Nicol. México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. SIMPSON, George Gaylord. 1944. Tempo and Mode in Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.

1949. The Meaning of Evolution. A Study of the History of Life and of Its Significance for Man. Yale University Press, New Haven and London.

1953. The MajorFeatures of Evolution. Columbia University Press, New York.

SMITH, Edward E. y Douglas L. Medin. 1981 Categories and Concepts. London, Harvard University Press. STEWARD, Matthew 1997 La verdad sobre todo. Una historia irreverente de la filosofía. Madrid. Taurus. STRINGER 1999 ?Homo erectus y Homo sapiens arcaico. ¿Puede definirse al Homo erectus? En: Jean-Jacques Hublin y Anne-Marie Tillier Homo sapiens en busca de sus orígenes. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica. SUR TOVAR, Francisco y Marisol Montellano Ballesteros 1994 ?El concepto de especie en organismos fósiles? en: Jorge Llorente Bousquest e Isolda Luna Vega (comp.) Taxonomía biológica, México, Fondo de Cultura Económica. TATTERSALL, Ian. 1992 ?Species Concepts and Species Identification in Human Evolution. Journal of Human Evolution ,U.S., Academic Press Limited, 22 p. 341-349. 1995 The Fossil Trail. How We Know What We Think We Know about Human Evolution. New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press. 1998 Becoming Human. Evolution an Human Uniqueness. San Diego, A Harvest Book Harcout Brace and Company. traducción: Tattersal, Ian. Hacia el ser humano. La singularidad del hombre y la evolución. Barcelona, Ediciones Península,(traducción de Joan Solé Solé), 1998. 2009 The Fossil Trail. How We Know What We Think We Know about Human Evolution. New York, Oxford, Oxford University Press.

TATTERSAL, Ian , Eric Delson y John Van Couvering. 1988 Encyclopedia of Human Evolution and Prehistory. United States of America. TOBIAS, Phillip V. 1969 Man´s Past and Future. Johannesburg, Witwatersrand University Press. 1971 The Brain in hominid Evolution. NEW York & London, Columbia University Press. 1991 Images of Humanity. The Selected Writings of Phillip Tobias. Rivonia, Ashanti Publishing. TOURAINE, Alain 2000 Crítica de modernidad. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica TRIGGER, Bruce G. 1989 A History of Archaelogical Thought. Cambridg, Cambridge University Press. URSUA, Nicanor 1993 Cerebro y conocimiento: un enfoque evolucionista. Barcelona, Editorial Anthropos. VALENCIA Ávalos, Susana. 1999 ?El problema del concepto de especie. En: Juan Núñez-Farfán y Luis E. Eguiarte, La evolución biológica, México, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México. WILSON, Edward O. 1980 Sobre la naturaleza humana. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica. WINDSHUTLLE, Keith 2000 The Killing of History: How Literary Crstics and Social Theorits Are Murdering Our Past. 3a edition. San Francisco, Encounte Books. WOLF, Eric R. 1987 Europa y la gente sin historia. México, Fondo de Cultura Económica. WOLPOFF, Milford H. 1980 Paleoanthropology. New York, Alfred A. Knopf. WOOD, Bernard. 1992 ?Origin and Evolution of the genus Homo? . Nature, England, Macmillan Magazine Ltd, 27 Febraury, 355 p. 783-790. 1992 ? Early hominid Species and Speciation. Journal of Human Evolution, U.S., Academic Press Limited, 22 p.351-365. WOOD, Bernard y Mark Collard 1999 ?The Human Genus. Science, USA, American Association for the Advance of Science, 2 April, 284 p. 65-71. 2001 ?The Meaning of Homo. Ludus Vitalis, México, IX (15): 63-74. WYNN, Thomas 1993 ?Layers of Thinking in Tool Behavior? En: Katleen R. Gibson y Tim Ingold (Eds) Tools, Language and Cognition in Human Evolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. ZAVALA OLALDE, J.C. 2012. Ontogenia y teoría biocultural. CopIt-ArXives, México.

ZEKI, S.F.R.S. 1999 ?Splendours and miseria of the brain. London, The Royal Society, Phil Trans R. Soc. Lond B 354:2053-2065.

Dedicatoria

Para María, Hani y Chelsea con amor.

Agradecimiento

La realización de este libro ha sido gracias a la beca posdoctoral en el extranjero proporcionada por CONACYT. No. Propuesta 208019.

 

Los caminos de la paleoantropología.

 

 

 

Autor:

Juan Carlos Zavala Olalde.

Partes: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5
 Página anterior Volver al principio del trabajoPágina siguiente 

Nota al lector: es posible que esta página no contenga todos los componentes del trabajo original (pies de página, avanzadas formulas matemáticas, esquemas o tablas complejas, etc.). Recuerde que para ver el trabajo en su versión original completa, puede descargarlo desde el menú superior.

Todos los documentos disponibles en este sitio expresan los puntos de vista de sus respectivos autores y no de Monografias.com. El objetivo de Monografias.com es poner el conocimiento a disposición de toda su comunidad. Queda bajo la responsabilidad de cada lector el eventual uso que se le de a esta información. Asimismo, es obligatoria la cita del autor del contenido y de Monografias.com como fuentes de información.

Categorias
Newsletter